Wildfire Litigation Lawyers in California

Wildfires cause devastating losses across California, leaving families and businesses facing life-altering injuries, destroyed property, and wrongful deaths. Our wildfire litigation lawyers represent victims in complex, high-stakes cases involving utility companies, corporations, and other negligent parties. As experienced trial lawyers, we prepare every wildfire case as if it will go to court—because accountability matters.

 

What Causes Wildfires in California?

Wildfires in California are rarely unavoidable acts of nature. While drought, wind, and terrain may contribute to how quickly a fire spreads, many of the most destructive wildfires are traced back to human negligence and preventable failures. Identifying the true cause of a wildfire is one of the most important steps in wildfire litigation, as it forms the foundation for establishing liability against responsible parties.

One of the most common causes of catastrophic wildfires is utility equipment failure. Aging power lines, poorly maintained transmission equipment, and inadequate safety shutoff procedures have been linked to some of California’s largest and deadliest fires. When utility companies fail to inspect, repair, or de-energize equipment during high-risk conditions, a single spark can ignite thousands of acres and devastate entire communities.

Wildfires may also result from improper vegetation management. Utilities, contractors, and government entities are often required to clear brush, maintain defensible space, and comply with fire-prevention regulations. When these responsibilities are ignored or improperly handled, dry vegetation becomes fuel that allows fires to spread uncontrollably. Failure to follow established safety standards can expose responsible parties to significant legal liability.

In other cases, wildfires are caused by construction activity, heavy machinery, or industrial operations. Sparks from equipment, welding operations, or vehicle malfunctions can ignite dry conditions, particularly in wildfire-prone regions. Contractors and corporations operating in these areas are expected to take heightened precautions, and failure to do so may constitute negligence under California law.

Determining the cause of a wildfire often requires extensive investigation, including expert analysis, forensic fire modeling, and review of maintenance records and safety protocols. Wildfire litigation is complex by nature, but when negligence plays a role, victims have the right to pursue accountability and compensation from those whose actions—or inaction—led to devastating losses.

Who Can Be Held Liable in a Wildfire Lawsuit?

Wildfire litigation focuses on identifying the parties whose negligence caused or contributed to the fire and the resulting damage. Because wildfires often spread rapidly across vast areas, liability is rarely simple. Multiple entities may share responsibility, and uncovering that responsibility requires detailed investigation, technical expertise, and a legal team prepared to take on powerful defendants.

Utility companies are among the most frequently named defendants in California wildfire lawsuits. Electric utilities have a legal duty to properly maintain power lines, transmission equipment, and related infrastructure. When utilities fail to inspect aging equipment, ignore known hazards, or neglect to de-energize lines during extreme fire conditions, they may be held liable for fires sparked by their systems. These cases often involve extensive records, expert testimony, and aggressive defense tactics.

Corporations and private companies may also be held accountable when their operations create wildfire risks. Industrial facilities, energy companies, and businesses operating heavy machinery in fire-prone areas are required to follow strict safety protocols. Sparks from equipment, poor operational planning, or failure to implement fire-prevention measures can expose corporations to significant liability when fires occur.

Contractors and construction companies are another common source of wildfire liability. Construction activity, land clearing, welding, and vehicle use can all ignite fires under dry conditions. Contractors are expected to take heightened precautions when working in wildfire-prone regions. When they cut corners or disregard safety regulations, they may be responsible for the resulting damage.

In some cases, government entities may also bear liability. Public agencies responsible for land management, infrastructure maintenance, or wildfire prevention may be held accountable when negligence contributes to a fire. While claims against government entities involve additional legal hurdles and strict deadlines, they remain an important part of many wildfire litigation cases.

Determining who can be held liable in a wildfire lawsuit is a complex process that often requires tracing the fire’s origin, analyzing safety failures, and identifying every party involved. Experienced wildfire litigation lawyers play a critical role in uncovering liability and ensuring that all responsible parties are held accountable for the harm they caused.

Types of Damages Available in Wildfire Litigation

Wildfires can cause far-reaching harm that extends well beyond the immediate destruction caused by flames. In California wildfire litigation, victims may be entitled to recover damages for both economic and non-economic losses, depending on how the fire affected their lives, property, and livelihoods. The scope of damages in these cases is often substantial, reflecting the catastrophic nature of wildfire events.

Personal injury damages may be available to individuals who suffered burns, smoke inhalation, respiratory injuries, or other physical harm as a result of a wildfire. Many victims experience long-term or permanent medical complications, requiring ongoing treatment, rehabilitation, and care. Compensation may include medical expenses, future medical costs, lost income, and reduced earning capacity when injuries impact a person’s ability to work.

Property damage losses are a central component of many wildfire lawsuits. Homeowners, renters, and property owners may seek compensation for destroyed residences, personal belongings, vehicles, and land. Wildfire litigation may also address the cost of debris removal, rebuilding, and loss of use when families are displaced for extended periods of time.

Wildfires can be devastating for business owners, particularly those forced to shut down due to property destruction, evacuation orders, or supply chain disruptions. Business interruption damages may include lost profits, operating expenses, and long-term financial harm caused by prolonged closures or relocation.

In addition to economic losses, wildfire victims may pursue non-economic damages for emotional distress, trauma, and loss of quality of life. Displacement, loss of community, and the psychological impact of surviving a wildfire can have lasting effects that deserve recognition under the law.

In the most tragic cases, wildfires result in the loss of life. When this occurs, surviving family members may be entitled to pursue compensation through a wrongful death claim as part of broader wildfire litigation. These claims seek to address the profound personal and financial losses suffered by families after a preventable wildfire.

Who Is Eligible to File a Wildfire Litigation Claim?

Eligibility to file a wildfire litigation claim in California depends on how the wildfire impacted an individual’s life, property, or livelihood. Because wildfires often affect entire communities, many different types of victims may have the right to pursue compensation. Determining eligibility requires a careful review of the circumstances surrounding the fire and the losses suffered.

Homeowners whose residences were damaged or destroyed by a wildfire are among the most common claimants. This includes individuals who lost primary homes, secondary residences, or real property as a result of fire-related destruction. Compensation may address rebuilding costs, loss of use, and long-term property damage.

Renters may also be eligible to file wildfire claims, even if they did not own the property that burned. Renters often suffer significant losses, including destruction of personal belongings, displacement, relocation expenses, and emotional distress. California law recognizes that renters can experience serious harm when wildfires force them from their homes.

Business owners affected by wildfires may qualify to pursue claims for property damage, lost inventory, and business interruption. Even businesses that did not burn may be eligible if wildfire conditions, evacuation orders, or infrastructure damage caused financial losses or forced closures.

Displaced residents who were forced to evacuate or permanently relocate due to wildfire conditions may also have valid claims. Extended displacement can lead to substantial financial and emotional hardship, particularly when communities are rendered uninhabitable for long periods of time.

In cases where a wildfire results in loss of life, surviving family members may be eligible to pursue claims on behalf of their loved ones. Eligibility and available compensation depend on the nature of the loss and the relationship to the deceased.

Because wildfire litigation often involves complex factual and legal issues, determining who is eligible to file a claim is not always straightforward. An experienced wildfire litigation lawyer can evaluate individual circumstances and help victims understand their legal options.

Why Trial Experience Matters in Wildfire Litigation

Wildfire litigation is fundamentally different from routine personal injury cases. These claims often involve catastrophic losses, multiple defendants, and corporate entities with vast financial and legal resources. Utility companies, corporations, and government agencies routinely deploy teams of defense attorneys, expert witnesses, and investigators to limit their exposure. In this environment, trial experience is not optional—it is essential.

Firms that lack courtroom experience may approach wildfire cases with a settlement-first mindset. While early settlements may appear attractive, they often fail to account for the full scope of losses suffered by wildfire victims, particularly long-term medical needs, permanent displacement, and future financial harm. Defendants are acutely aware of which law firms are willing and able to take cases to trial, and that knowledge directly influences settlement negotiations.

Trial-ready wildfire litigation lawyers prepare every case as if it will be presented before a jury. This approach requires extensive investigation, development of expert testimony, and a willingness to confront powerful defendants in court. When defense teams know a firm is prepared to litigate aggressively, they are far more likely to engage in meaningful settlement discussions that reflect the true value of a case.

Wildfire trials also present unique challenges. Jurors must understand complex technical evidence, including fire origin analysis, equipment failures, and regulatory violations. Lawyers with trial experience know how to present these issues clearly and persuasively, ensuring that accountability is not lost in technical complexity.

For wildfire victims, choosing a law firm with proven trial experience can significantly impact the outcome of a case. Trial readiness strengthens negotiating leverage, increases accountability, and helps ensure that responsible parties are held fully accountable for the devastation caused by preventable wildfires.

How Our California Wildfire Litigation Lawyers Can Help

Wildfire litigation requires far more than filing paperwork or negotiating with insurance companies. These cases demand a coordinated legal strategy, deep resources, and a willingness to confront powerful defendants. Our California wildfire litigation lawyers guide victims through every stage of the legal process, handling the complexity so clients can focus on rebuilding their lives.

The process begins with a thorough investigation into the cause of the wildfire and the parties responsible. This often involves reviewing utility records, maintenance logs, safety protocols, and government reports, as well as working with fire investigators and industry experts. Identifying the true origin of a wildfire is critical to building a strong case and establishing liability.

Wildfire litigation also requires strategic case development. Our legal team works with experts in fire science, engineering, economics, and medicine to document the full scope of losses suffered by wildfire victims. This includes not only immediate damages, but also long-term medical needs, future financial losses, and the lasting emotional impact of displacement and trauma.

Throughout the litigation process, we handle communication with defendants, insurers, and opposing counsel, allowing clients to avoid the stress of direct confrontation with large corporations or utility companies. We prepare every case with the expectation that it may proceed to trial, ensuring that negotiations are backed by credible litigation leverage rather than empty threats.

Wildfire victims often face overwhelming financial uncertainty. For that reason, our wildfire litigation cases are handled on a contingency fee basis, meaning there are no upfront legal fees. Clients do not pay unless compensation is recovered. Our focus is on accountability, justice, and securing results that reflect the true impact of catastrophic wildfires.

Frequently Asked Questions About Wildfire Litigation

How long do I have to file a wildfire litigation claim in California?

The time limit to file a wildfire litigation claim depends on the type of claim and the parties involved. Claims against private entities generally have longer statutes of limitations than claims involving government agencies, which may require notice within months. Because deadlines can vary and evidence can disappear quickly, it is important to speak with a wildfire litigation lawyer as soon as possible.

Do I need to prove who started the wildfire to file a claim?

You do not need to personally prove the cause of the wildfire on your own. Wildfire litigation lawyers work with investigators, fire experts, and engineers to determine how the fire started and who may be responsible. Establishing causation is a core part of wildfire litigation and is handled through expert analysis and evidence gathering.

Can I file a wildfire claim if my home did not burn down?

Yes. Many wildfire claims involve losses beyond total property destruction. Displacement, smoke damage, loss of use, evacuation costs, business interruption, and emotional distress may all be compensable, even if a structure was not completely destroyed. Eligibility depends on how the wildfire impacted your life or property.

How long does wildfire litigation usually take?

Wildfire litigation is complex and often takes longer than standard personal injury cases. These cases may involve multiple defendants, extensive discovery, expert testimony, and large volumes of evidence. While some cases resolve through settlement, others may proceed to trial. A trial-ready legal team helps ensure the case is handled efficiently while pursuing full accountability.

Will I have to go to court for a wildfire lawsuit?

Many wildfire cases resolve without a full trial, but preparation for trial is essential. Defendants are more likely to offer fair settlements when they know a law firm is prepared to present the case in court. If a trial becomes necessary, your legal team will guide you through the process and prepare you every step of the way.

How much does it cost to hire a wildfire litigation lawyer?

Most wildfire litigation cases are handled on a contingency fee basis. This means there are no upfront legal fees, and clients only pay if compensation is recovered. This arrangement allows wildfire victims to pursue justice without taking on additional financial risk.

Contact Our Firm to Learn More

If there is no recovery, then there are never any fees or costs to you.

Disclaimer
*Disclaimer: This website is an advertisement as defined by the Rules of Professional Conduct and applicable Business and Professions Code for each state we have an office in and practice in. ELLIS RICCOBONO, LLP is licensed to practice law in the States of California, and Hawaii. They are also licensed to practice in Federal Courts, where admitted. In certain cases, we have represented individuals in other states/jurisdictions by way of pro hac vice. The content of this website is intended to convey general information. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. It is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

List of Representative Fire Cases

Wildfire Litigation Lawyer CaliforniaOur attorneys have obtained hundreds of millions of dollars in recoveries for fire victims harmed by the major wildfires across the State since 2015 caused by large corporations or utility companies.

  • 2015 Butte Fire against PG&E (Butte County)
  • 2017 Tubbs Fire against PG&E (Sonoma County)
  • 2017 Redwood Valley Fire against PG&E (Mendocino County)
  • 2017 Sulphur Fire against PG&E (Lake County)
  • 2017/2018 Thomas Fire & Mudslides against SCE (Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties)
  • 2018 Woolsey Fire against SCE (Ventura and Los Angeles Counties)
  • 2018 Camp Fire against PG&E (Butte County)
  • 2022 McKinney Fire against PacifiCorp (Siskiyou County)
  • 2022 Mill Fire against Roseburg Forest Products Co. (Siskiyou County)
  • 2022 Mosquito Fire against PG&E (El Dorado and Placer Counties)
  • 2022 Hermit’s Peak/Calf Canyon Fire (New Mexico)
  • 2023 Lahaina Wildfire (Hawaii)
  • 2024 Airport Fire (Orange and Riverside Counties)
  • 2024 Bridge Fire (Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties)